In a statement вскрыты lzhesvydetelstva facts, falsyfykatsyy ulyk, violations of human rights. Prosmatryvayutsya symptom orhanyzovannoy prestupnoy group activities in MIA, прокуратуры, ships. http://blacklist.ucoz.ua/publ To the regional prosecutor's Mykolayiv region
Defender shuffler George V.
st. Riverside, 34 pp. Maliivka,
Bereznehuvatskoho area Mykolaiv region. 56 214
Tel. 0978544661 Tel. 0516894390
Statement of the crimes.
(For staff misconduct Interior Ministry, prosecutors, courts Mykolayiv region in a criminal case № 1-45/2010 (criminal case № 09080087).)
In a criminal case materials that prove that operational staff Bereznehuvatskoho ROVD Hodnyka Khokhlov and filed false reports of crimes. Based on this dezynformatsiyi was customary Operational business. 25.08.2009 Testing was carried out procurement of drugs in unknown person. Prescribed buyers Voronin (Kravchenko), Onischuk (Shevchenko), concepts Tryfonenko, Kozlova, Martyniuk data on pre-trial investigation significantly different from the testimony given in court. From the testimony of a witness Onischuk (Shevchenko), which he gave in court, he zakupovuvav drugs August 28, 2009 by an unknown person at an unknown person. And 28.08.2009 criminal case was opened against unknown persons. Investigators do not set the names of unknown persons. Kornya witness to address listed in the file did not reside. According reception reports Bereznehuvatskoho ROVD knows where it's gone through that, despite numerous request the defendant and his counsel, he was taken to court. Testimony of witnesses and most buyers agents in court proceedings data contradict the information indicated in the staff report Bereznehuvatskoho ROVD Khokhlova, Hodyky.
Considers that the witnesses Tryfonenko, Onischuk (Shevchenko), Korn qualify as giving false testimony, confirming that these witnesses are dependent on the police, and interested parties.
Considers that the witnesses - staff Bereznehuvatskoho ROVD Khokhlova, Hodyky qualify as giving false testimony, evidence and artificial creation abuse of authority cent. 365 CC of Ukraine.
To be sure, evidence of buyers, concepts, data, their bodies, preliminary investigation, and the District Attorney, 100% identical word for word only because it had been copied in a text editor WORD through the operation of copying one file to another. During questioning in court, held with the consent of Judge N. Jaworski as defender Chernjuk SE and defendants Chernjuk Oh, 1 shopper Shevchenko abruptly changed their testimony, the witness also Tryfonenko actually declined in the testimony given by authorities inquiry. Kornya witness disappeared, assume that this myth, which itself does not suspect that a witness. Testimony Martyniuk and Kozlov also does not significantly overlap.
Judged Chernjuk live in large families. He has two older brother Gregory and Yuri. Gregory shuffler, who lives in the village. Jaworski Maliivka judge refused to call in the courtroom.
Yurochko investigator is not condemned alibi checked that from 25 August to 22 September was 100 = 120 km from the crime scene in his brothers. I can 100% say that false information about family members was extracted fraud investigation by authorities, but no artificial Help brothers formally gave reason to believe pre-trial investigation, which condemned himself invented an alibi, because according to information he No these brethren, so be 100 km from the crime scene during the crime could not.
Defender Chernjuk SE defendant Chernjuk Oh and hoped that the police officer Voronin (in the decision to conduct operas. Purchase as "Kravchenko) in the judicial investigation will clarify the situation or make a clean confession of libel, tell how he spent the manipulation of drugs in car that despite the instructions on the operational rules for procurement were not in all cases obshukano, and with money that appeared to be condemned the next day. Why he gave false testimony? But the judge Jaworski NO hastily and arbitrarily, illegally of his decision not to allow police officer interrogated in court as the defender and the defendant "encrypted" it (Voronin) and illegally removed from the Hall court as counsel and defendant, who could not therefore ask a witness questions. Voronin policeman even without the presence of counsel and defendant changed his testimony. So he said that had an unsuccessful attempt to purchase operational in shuffler SE September 18, 2009, that protection motivation failed provocation crime. Judged at this time was in lectures in the city of Mykolayiv. Voronin Police Officer in this area rather famous person: Chernjuk SE defender saw him
1) 18 September 2009 during an unsuccessful attempt to purchase operational.
2) in October is about Voronin proposed defender Chernjuk SE obshutsi to be witnesses in the neighbor.
3) The indictment also states that person using my real name.
Because artificial encryption court protection this famous person qualifies as fraud, manipulation and witnessed abuse of authority by the judge Jaworski N. What is bread and shelter their position on the side and covering the prosecution of offenders to police.
In the study audyozapysu and comparing it to court records I have found many distortions and outright lies made by the judge Jaworski NO. Yes audyozapys questioning a witness Voronin, after illegally removing the defender and the defendant with courtroom significantly different from his written testimony that his name read out in court the judge Jaworski NO. This indicates that the judge arbitrarily edited his testimony, the confirmed its position on the prosecution side and artificially created false evidence in court.
Next in court to have defendant Chernjuk LI talked about the bruise on the cheek of his son, who has seen during the illegal invasion of 1910 police at our accommodation, the 02/10/2009. But not a word said that she had seen in bright afternoon sun glow luminescence in the hands of his son. In his additions to the minutes I lie on this point, and it confirms audyozapys which we judge Jaworski listened several times. But in sentencing judge Jaworski NO personally invented this false evidence, and pointed it. Repeated this lie in the Court of Appeal 25.05 2010. Attorney Maksymyshyn and submitted as evidence. This indicates that the materials appellate judges and) no one acquainted b) has an organized criminal group in the regional prosecutor's departments and regional court, which protects the criminals in uniform and robe and falsifies criminal case.
About bruise on the cheek, the son of a sentence or word.
Here is a partial list of documents that indicate the service violations or abuse of authority and may disappear from the criminal case:
1. The Report (a.s.211) Hodyky OJ that he continuously held unlawful methods of interrogation for 21 hours 09/26/2009 11.30 27. Was 09.2009, and the protocol of detention should not prepare 09/26/2009. In Snigurivs'ka ITT Chernjuk Oh was admitted only after 26 hours of detention.
2. Sitting of 19 March 2010 was conducted after the court notified the office entrance. № 2963 from 19.03.2010, the written statement of withdrawal of counsel Judge N. Jaworski. Written application for the judges on the basis of numerous violations of criminal procedural law, which became known after the start of court proceedings, it was about 10 years. March 19 2010 .. Immediately after the trial in 11 years. 30 min. public defender stated orally, provided a statement of the judges, but Judge N. Jaworski interrupted message and not making sure why the prosecutor was not hastily gave final speech. The right of final speech also touched Judge N. Jaworski. Numerous questions interrupting accused by the judge (about 7 perebyvan) without the presence of the prosecutor in the meeting room violated defendant's right to the last word. This statement of withdrawal must be in business.
3. Sitting twice, namely, 19/3/2010, and 22.03 in 2010 for unexplained reasons the judge held a prosecutor Dyachenko DA. If the court does not appear the prosecutor had to postpone the hearing in accordance with art. 289 Code of Ukraine. Not these rules of criminal procedure law has led to abuse charges in court Attorney distortion of facts, names and addresses of its bias to the verdict.
4. Resolution of the criminal case № 09080087 into the unknown sales person (a.s.1)
5. Employee of the Report BNON Bereznehuvatskoho RO UMVD Hodyky OV from 25.08.2009, that the unknown citizen from the village. Maliivka Bereznehuvatskoho District zbuv citizen Shevchenko OI narcotic (AS 3) very funny. In the judicial investigation agent shopper Onischuk (Shevchenko) gave evidence that Hodyka knew this unknown person. But somehow not informed of it. And it is the unknown person on words Onischuk (Shevchenko) he sold the narcotic from another unknown person. I suspect that these unknown person gave Hodyki bribe, so he deliberately exposed them not. (Proof - audyozapys).
1. The term pre-trial Art. investigators Bereznehuvatskoho ROVD Yurochko VM illegally was twice exceeded. These violations of Art. 120 Code of Ukraine as not vidslidkovuvalys District Prosecutor and the Deputy Regional Prosecutor century. Adviser Justice Borshulyak II, who on the basis of false data allowed to extend pre-trial to 3 months and then to 4-months. (A.s.165). This in turn led to the illegal adoption of several resolutions Bereznehuvatskoho District Court on extension of detention that violated Art. 156 Code of Ukraine. I personally filed three complaints in the district prosecution of violations of law Yurochko investigators, including his challenge because of numerous violations of the Constitution and laws of Ukraine. But District Attorney Korzhenko SB intentionally did not want to confirm these violations, including exceeding the period of detention (no time is the protocol of detention), a piece of evidence Hodykoyu GS (artificial-proof money was transferred Chernjuk Oh broken the next day), the physical pressure to my son, which caused physical pain (medical examination but my son still was not carried out), 26 hours of continuous questioning without sleep, food, with special serial products. Moreover, the district attorney Korzhenko SB deliberately ignored repeated exceedances of the investigation investigators Yurochko and helped him get a ruling on illegal deputy regional prosecutor century. Adviser Justice Borshulyak II, which on the basis of false data allowed to extend pre-trial investigation to 4-months. These actions qualify as official abuse and abuse of authority.
2. Illegal ordinance adopted by the deputy regional prosecutor century. Adviser Justice Borshulyak II, qualifies as negligence. (It is unlikely that this ordinance false, and made the computer).
3. 24/02/2010 Oh shuffler then defendants from prison was filed complaint number 04 \ 2-747 in the Regional Prosecutor's Office did not respond to the district prosecutor Bereznehuvatskoho numerous violations bodies of inquiry and preliminary investigation. Has no Responses.
4. 25.12.2009 Chernjuk Oh, the prison was filed with the appeal of the illegal arrest Bereznehuvatskym extension trial. Has no Responses.
5. After 2 unsuccessful procurement (25.08.2009 and 18.09.2009), a simulation of 3-th purchase, but for a reinsurance questioning Oh shuffler is restricted to special facilities within 26 hours continuously, without sleep, rest, without food, activated psyhosuhestiyi techniques, protocol without detention. Only a mentally and physically breaking shuffler AJ operatives seen him give out money that he allegedly acquired the shopper from the agent for 20 hours before, and demonstrate effectively show the freewill issue with his money (AY shuffler) anus body under the camera.
6. Examination results should be in the file, denying that money were almost daily in the anus.
7. Zasudzhenomu Chernjuk Oh Jaworski N.I judge denied dooznayomlenni with materials of criminal case and to examine the court records, despite numerous petitions submitted and champion Chernjuk SE and defendants Chernjuk Oh. That were filed on time and underpinned by the constitution and PDA Ukraine. These actions Jaworski N.I judge to limit the defendant's right to protection qualified as abuse of authority, and fear of confirming judges to be exposed to their offense. Evidence of violations recorded in the criminal case materials and audyozapysu.
8. Oh Chernjuk sentenced to prison 21/04/2010 filed an application number 20 entrance. 20 \ 12/02/1913 Court of Appeal in Mykolaiv region. for dooznayomlennya from criminal prosecution. But he was not given that opportunity.
9. On 2 April 2010 in case there were no important documents, such as a statement of the judges Jaworski NO, which is registered in the office of the court and voiced by the defender in court.
10. Rights violations condemned to date with the defender. Despite numerous applications and requests defender only after the Court of Appeals 5/25/2010, the date was right № 11-285 signed by Judge V. Grebenyuk
11. Denied dooznayomleni defender of the criminal appellate court, by finding the unknown criminal case. This complaint was filed on May 19, 2010 Despite the submitted applications and requests to protect the condemned and not given to this possibility this time. Suspect fraud criminal case materials.
This incomplete list of divisions in the criminal case materials. As the body of inquiry recorded false information in their case, this tradition supported by bodies of pre-trial support Bereznehuvatskoyi prosecutor and Deputy District region. Attorney Borshulyak II (Assume that merely suggest the latter). Bereznehuvatskoho judges and district judges Snigurivs'ka more actively and openly continued the baton and recorded their criminal actions in the file, which also recorded on audio CD. So no matter the Office of the Appeal Court had reason to become worried about her safety as a collection of official abuse and evidence of innocence Chernjuk my son Alexander. I suspect that abuse took the baton to accept the Court of Appeal Mykolaiv region.
This application must raise from the SBU archive materials operational in October 2009, which should be fixed fact of my appeal to the extortion of bribes SBU employees Bereznehuvatskoho ROVD return for closing a criminal case. Then SBU interest to this case somehow disappeared, but I SBU officers and prosecutors have offered to conduct rapid development officers, to conduct an alternative investigation and collect evidence. Wines of each offender is proved by documents.
I demand to stop the criminal activities of officers as police, prosecution, courts, who falsified criminal charges and illegally punished my son Chernjuk Oh.
May 27, 2010 \ Chernjuk YV \
|