Analysis pryemov and metodov falsyfykatsyy uholovnыh Affairs judges and predlahaemыe methods for s neytralyzatsyy. In the example of a specific criminal affairs issues are considered Actual combat falsyfykatsyyamy uholovnыh affairs most judges in Snehyrevskom judges Mykolaiv region.
Article 3 of the Constitution: Man, his life and health, honor and dignity, immunity and safety, pryznayutsya in Ukraine nayvыsshey sotsyalnoy tsennostyu. Human rights and freedoms and their warranty opredelyayut contents and activities napravlennost state. The State otvechaet front man of for their activities. Adoption and Securing human rights and freedoms yavlyaetsya importantly obyazannostyu state.
Level of democracy in the state is determined nezavysymostyu, otkrыtostyu and dostupnostyu pravosudyya for citizens.
Article 129 of the Constitution. Judges at osuschestvlenyy pravosudyya regardless and podchynyayutsya lysh law.
Sudoproyzvodstvo plant is edynolychno judges, judges or court College prysyazhnыh.
Basic Principles sudoproyzvodstva:
1) rule of law;
2) ravenstvo of all participants sudebnoho process before the law and justice;
3) Securing proof vynы;
4) sostyazatelnost side and freedom in predostavlenyy expedient court svoyh proof and in the court s dovedenyy ubedytelnosty;
5) podderzhanye obvynenyya of state prosecutor in court;
6) Securing obvynyaemomu protection of rights;
7) publicity sudebnoho process and his Full, fyksyrovanye Technical funds;
8) Securing apellyatsyonnoho and kassatsyonnoho obzhalovanyya solutions judgment, except of cases, ustanovlennыh law;
9) obyazatelnost solutions judgment.
Law opredelenы Maybe also others in the courts Principles sudoproyzvodstva otdelnoy sudebnoy jurisdiction.
For neuvazhenye in court and judges vynovnыe Faces pryvlekayutsya k a legal liability.
This article of the Constitution trebuyut such judgment obespechyt opportunity to protect the rights and freedoms of man and citizen of Ukraine.
Item 7 of Art. 129 Constitution daet opportunity zaschyte in court fyksyrovat all proof podsudymoho innocence.
Therefore I, as a zaschytnyk in court, filed in hodataystvo Snyhuryvskyy County Court Mykolaiv region at the order process fyksyrovanyya sudebnoho Technical funds and manufacture copies of disc protection, hodataystva text:
A. "When predыduschem and criminal affairs sudebnom rassmotrenyyah number 09080087 in Snyhuryvskom judges under Article 87-1 CCP of Ukraine at fyksyrovanyy sudebnoho process Technical funds please Apply tehnycheskye funds for gait fyksatsyy sudoproyzvodstva.
2. According to § 5.29 Instructions on the order fyksyrovanyya sudebnoho process Technical obschyh funds in the courts of Ukraine (SUPPLEMENT 1) ask dat ukazanye arhyvaryusu on the creation of copies of fonohrammы for zaschytnyka Chernjuk Y. and vыdat immediately after EE manufacture.
3. In the study otdelnыh proof in criminal affairs do this, the materials and nekotorыh эpyzodov sudebnoho razbyratelstva ask the court allow the fotohrafyrovanye, audio, and kynosъemku vydeozapysy, as well as kserokopyrovanye, the scanning and others tehnycheskye funds fyksatsyy events. "
In my hodataystvu judges Snyhuryvskoho District Court (she also predsedatelstvuyuschaya) Kyshkovska ZA decided to sootvetstvuyuschee pozytyvnoe decision.
Thus, protection of in court has received the opportunity to conduct Alternative Integrated control fyksyrovat sudebnыy process sobstvennыmy Technical means.
Эta Mayor vыnuzhdennaya well as a system fyksyrovanyya sudebnoho meeting in Snyhuryvskom district judges beznadezhno moral, physical, zakonodatelno ustarenla, yes and another and rolled the same sabotyruetsya skrыtno most courts. During a introduction to the minutes of the meeting sudebnoho áûëî tselыy discovered the number of results hruboy falsyfykatsyy sudebnoho investigation, the parties and participants vыskazыvanyy process, the parties co Faces, kotoroe amounted protocol. As sledstvye, the analysis protocol bыly obnaruzhenы and zakreplenы facts falsyfykatsyy at fyksyrovanyy sudebnoho meeting Snyhuryvskoho District Court. This is a phenomenon neprotsessualnoe potyanulo by a co doubts the parties protection otnosytelno nepredubezhdennosty district court judges Snnyhurыvskoho, mnohochyslennыe zamechanyya participants process k protocols, complaints on neobъektyvnost faktov of presentation and Events in the protocol.
Nevzyraya usylye of Ukrainian legislation and realyzovannыe SPECIFIC merы on zakreplenyyu of legal procedures for Technical uses of funds in rassmotrenyy sudebnыh Affairs, эta problem with rassmotrenyy do this, criminal affairs manifested itself sufficiently important and krymynalno.
Result fyksatsyy Technical funds at rassmotrenyy sudebnoho la yavlyaetsya pryamыm vazhnыm proof. There narushaetsya in Clause 7. 129 of the Constitution - the issue of transparency of the process of the present opinion sudebnoho criminal affairs. Namely, at rassmotrenyy do this, la result unychtozhenyya results fyksatsyy Technical funds as judges Kyshkovskoyu ZA significantly povlyyalo on fate podsudymoho Chernjuk AJ, and áûëî violations vsestoronnee fyksyrovanye sudebnoho process Technical raznыmy means.
In эtoy article on a specific example of criminal affairs analyzyruyutsya pryemы falsyfykatsyy criminal affairs as judges Kyshkovskoyu ZA through yskazhenye and unychtozhenye audio file Tehnicheskoe records and yspolzovannыe pryemы protection for judges vыkrыvanyyu-plutovky.
Otnosytelno of existing normatyvnoy bazы Technical uses of funds in sudoproyzvodstve you need to be listed, that the procedure fyksatsyy sudebnoho process in the Ukrainian sudoproyzvodstve enough zakreplena more reliable:
A. st.129 in the Constitution and
2. Article 9 of the Law of Ukraine «On sudoustroystve Ukraine", where among the principles of transparency sudoproyzvodstva provozhlasheno sudebnoho process and his Full, fyksyrovanye Technical means.
3. Law of Ukraine "On amendments to civilian protsessualnыy Code of Ukraine" from 21 June 2001, the number 2540-III will make in civilian protsessualnыy Code of Ukraine of 18 July 1963, the number 1540-VI Chapter 21 "Fyksyrovanyya sudebnoho process and protokolы», which regulates the issue fyksyrovanyya sudebnoho process, order sostavlenyya and clearance protocols, and also to rassmotrenyya zamechanyy, and protokolы sudebnoho meeting.
4. Law of Ukraine "On amending Arbytrazhnыy protsessualnыy Code of Ukraine" from 21 June 2001, the number 2539-III (Art. 44 and Art. 811),
5. Instruction about the order process fyksyrovanyya sudebnoho Technical funds in obschyh courts utverzhdennaya in Mynyuste 08.08.2005.
6. Instruction about the order process fyksyrovanyya sudebnoho Technical funds utverzhdennoy Prikaz sudebnoy the State Administration of Ukraine in September 24, 2004 № 161/04
Mainly the principles sudoproyzvodstva, opredelennыmy the Constitution, is the
A. ravenstvo of all participants sudebnoho process before the law and justice;
2. Securing proof vynы;
3. sostyazatelnost side and freedom in predostavlenyy expedient court svoyh proof and in the court s dokazыvanyy ystynnosty;
4. publicity sudebnoho process and his Full, fyksyrovanye Technical means.
On the need for vowel sudebnoho razbyratelstva talking a question also:
A. and a total Declaration of human rights - article 11
2. and in the Convention on the Rights and Community zaschyte human freedom (Rome, 4 November 1950 year, article 61), where, in particular, synonymom k openly rassmotrenyyu vыstupaet publicity.
3. and in the Act at sudoustroystve
4. and a resolution in the Plenum of the Supreme Court of Ukraine.
But for functioning in full of obъeme do this, the principle of transparency not only dolzhna svodytsya rolled freely access publyky in sudebnoho hall meeting and rolled right sobravshyhsya besprepyatstvenno ynformyrovat the Internet or the press of persons at the second volume that the heard of Ona and vydely during a sudebnoho process.
Notion of "publicity pravosudyya" Includes the right to someone from the lybo sobravshyhsya to openly sudebnom process with the help dostupnыh funds who do not prepyatstvuyut to others, nablyudat the progress of the process, fyksyrovat everything going on in that the dependence sudebnoho meeting. Can otmetyt that the publicity relates to the immediate process fyksyrovanyem Technical means.
For the realization of the principle of transparency mnoy That was in so doing sudebnom investigation zadeystvovano Integrated funds and ways to control Objectivity sudebnoho investigation:
1) to control for the holding of sudebnoho investigation in sudebnom meeting zaschytnykom That was filed at vыsheukazannoe hodataystvo holding of fyksatsyy sudebnoho process as a Technical specialists of judgment funds and so fyksatsyy sudebnoho process Technical protection of the funds for Fraud Warnings and falsyfykatsyy sudebnoho process the parties co judges Kyshkovskoy ZA (AS). Ie conduct of the Twin (dublyruyuscheho) fyksyrovanyya;
2) Detailed checking protocol sudebnoho meeting on the subject falsyfykatsyy sudebnoho process.
The second method of service zafyksyroval fact crimes judges Kyshkovskoyu ZA - Creation yskusstvennыh proof vynovatosty podsudymoho.
Minutes of the meeting sudebnoho Snyhuryvskoho District Court - a edynstvennыy protsessualnыy document in which you dolzhen fyksyrovatsya progresses and the results sudebnoho razbyratelstva la Chernjuk A.YU, and dolzhnы obъektyvno vosproyzvodytsya obstoyatelstva sudebnoho sledstvyya, debatы side, participants hodataystva process, restructuring, to ensure the Establishment ystynы, protection rights and freedoms of the participants of the process.
Using Integrated fyksyruyuschey apparaturы at fyksatsyy sudebnoho meeting gave the opportunity to catch zaschyte judges on the hot-plutovku at neudachnoy popыtke falsyfykatsyy sudebnoho investigation that the snyzylo The quality vыnesennoho pryhovora, his Sharpness, and not obespechylo accordance pryhovora rassledovannыm facts in court.
Unychtozhenye neustanovlennыmy to others adekvatnoy Tehnicheskoe fyksatsyy sudebnoho investigation, ustnoy speech and speech doproshennыh svydeteley predsedatelstvuyuschey judges has led K:
A. yskazhenyyu Secretary of presentation sudebnoho vыstuplenyy meeting participants of the process:
2. to replace the words and vыrazhenyy
3. proyzvolnoy ynterpretatsyy ustnыh Posts vыstupayuschyh
4. Apocalypse sofyzmu.
This is led k katastrofycheskym implications, poskolku protocol in fact not otobrazhen Studies A few very vazhnыh proof of cause of and Consequently, according to Part 2 st.323 CCP of Ukraine, will pryhovor podlezhat Othman.
Availability of the alternative second zaschytnyka Integrated fonohrammы sudebnoho meeting znachytelno oblehchylo address the issue of proof otnosytelno zamechanyy, podannыh k sudebnoho meeting minutes, and appeared bыly zakreplenы sootvetstvuyuschye protsessualnыe Guarantee Objectivity rassmotrenyya sudebnoho affairs and decision judgment.
Thanks to the realization of opportunities article 87-1 CCP of Ukraine "Fyksyrovanyya sudebnoho process Technical funds" was vozmozhnыm Legalization operative information about the judges popыtke Kyshkovskoy ZA vыnesty zavedomo nezakonnыy pryhovor and send in the courts and 2-ynstantsyy and court kassatsyonnoy ynstantsyy complaints on restoration of the Ukrainian pravosudyya Objectivity and combat co sluzhebnыmy crimes in the courts.
We need also that this is otmetyt innovations zaschytnyka vыzvalo nedovolstvo, nevospryyatye, sabotage chastyu sudeyskoho case in Snyhuryvskom district judges and judges in apellyatsyonnom in Mykolaiv region in rassmotrenyy apellyatsyy by so doing cause of. Question: why? And after that in the Tacoma case, judges Kyshkovska ZA dolzhna neuklonno adhere to the law of installed procedures for rassmotrenyya criminal affairs, not procedural uproschenyya tolerances, but subjects more than falsyfykatsyy. Judges you need otkazыvatsya from sofyzma, knavery, falsyfykatsyy.
In Snyhuryvskom judges absent in the necessary equipment is full of complex sounds, the same K Ono fyksyruet sudebnыy the electoral process lysh, microphone for podsudymoho otsutstvoval or not worked as. With him absent zvukovaya channel run. Yes, and you sweat These audio files bыly otredaktyrovanы and preobrazovanы in 4 bit mode instead of recording 16 Bit. That is Information-proof unychtozhenы. Byudzhetnыe funds vыdelenы, but rashodovanы not on purpose. And after duly neobespechenye state conditions for osuschestvlenyya pravosudyya, particularly fyksyrovanye sudebnoho process technically funds, delaet nevozmozhnыm svoevremennoe receipt sudebnoy citizens protection of their rights in court narushennыh first and apellyatsyonnoy ynstantsyy. But this is contrary to the requirements of Article 6 of the Convention on the Rights and Community zaschyte freedom that the right of everybody to ustanavlyvaet spravedlyvoe sudebnoe razbyratelstvo.
Protection of the the alternative fyksyrovanye sudebnoho razbyratelstva Technical funds successfully and legally áûëî realyzovano and allowed the allocate Such pryemы fyksatsyy sudebnoho meeting and razoblachyt sleduyuschye facts falsyfykatsyy sudebnoho process judges Kyshkovskoyu ZA and gave sleduyuschye opportunities:
1) rasshyfrovat and formalize the content stenohrammы posledneho words podsudymoho Chernjuk A. in zamechanyyah k log sudebnoho meeting, present in zamechanyyah k log detalnuyu transcript vыstuplenyy in the debate and zaschytnyka podsudymoho and others;
2) vydeozapys sudebnoho meeting;
3) Comparing stenohrammы vыstuplenyy vazhnыh svydeteley obvynenyya s protocol sudebnoho meeting. CEI admission razoblachyl falsyfykatsyyu svydetelstv doproshennыh svydeteley as judges. Judges redaktyrovala involves speech svydeteley in the protocol under thy nezakonnыy pryhovor.
Even proslushav testimony in the record svydeteley judges upryamo not sohlashaetsya with yavnыm proof.
At a meeting of everybody Snyhuryvskoho judgment in so doing cause of áûëî set lysh 4 microphone:
A. for judges
2. Attorney
3. lawyer
4. svydetelya.
This is there is violation of the Constitution because of the fact that the Rede podsudymoho "Recently, the word" and others involves speech Chernjuk O. not fyksyrovalas dolzhnыm image.
Device sounds in court obsluzhyval secretary, who for the holding of records sledyl sudebnoho process and simultaneously osuschestvlyal otmetku specifically in the journal, a model of Kotor argues Ministry of Justice. Logging yavlyaetsya neotъemlemoy chastyu ofytsyalnoy records and pomohaet during a rasshyfrovыvanyya ego and proslushyvanyya. To ensure the control by constantly zapysyu the necessary presence All specialist at sudebnыh of all processes. But checking records during a holding of sudebnoho do this, the meeting was not conducted.
Vazhnoe significance for the holding of nadlezhascheho Tehnicheskoe records ymeet predыduschaya k nemu training.
Before Using equipment not Secretary systematychesky ubezhdalsya that the Ono operates dolzhnыm image involves speech and oral zapysыvayutsya correctly. To do this, before the beginning records tschatelnыm image dolzhna proveryatsya whole of job system. When lyubыh doubts otnosytelno nadlezhascheho holding of records or equipment zameschaetsya ustanavlyvaetsya surplus zapysыvayuschee device. Registrar dolzhen was, but not ubedylsya that the mykrofonы correctly podklyuchenы k zvukozapysыvayuschemu devices and dolzhnыm image raspolozhennыe before kazhdыm participant sudebnoho meeting in Tacoma Agenda: № 1 - judges Kyshkovska ZA ; № 2 - prokurorы (they for some reason it constantly yzmenyalys not yzuchyv Delhi); № 3 - zaschytnyk Chernjuk Y.; № 4 - svydetely; № 5 - obvynyaemыy, podsudymыy (microphone otsutstvoval). Mykrofonы number 3 and number 4 zapysыvaly Rede and zaschytnyka or prosecutor with rasstoyanyya me 1 meter and simultaneously through them was conducted Record speech podsudymoho with more than 6.5 meters rasstoyanyya and subsequent konvertatsyey records in 4 bit mode.
Registrar systematychesky not conducted testing equipment, not proveryal correctly whether fyksyruetsya every Saturday morning word operates Does everyone microphone. The secretary also dolzhen transfer in the program file to the beginning, proslushat recording and udostoverytsya that the level of sound recording yavlyaetsya normalnыm, but These requirements systematychesky narushalys.
Entries made by judges dolzhen Technical characteristics and requirements for complex sound in accordance with item 3.1 and p 3.2 Instructions at order fyksyrovanyya sudebnoho process Technical funds utverzhdennoy Prikaz sudebnoy the State Administration of Ukraine in September 24, 2004 № 161/04:
P. 3.1. Mykrofonы, mixer and zvukovaya complex sound card, dolzhnы Allow to recording with harakterystykoy not hudshey by:
- Range of chastotnыy - is already 70 ... 5000 Hz;
- Neravnomernost frequency response at the working frequency - not worse ± 3 dB;
- Frequency dyskretyzatsyy - not lower than 11,025 Hz;
- Dynamic Range of -55 dB. 3 dB;
- Razryadnost ADC 16 bits.
P. 3.2. Using these algorithms is permitted kompressyy digital stream:
IMA IDPCM; m-Law; A-Law; MPEG Layer 3 (1:4).
In the process proslushyvanyya audyozapysy Secretary dolzhen all the time trace, When zvukozapysыvayuschee equipment, kotoroe yspolzuetsya, indeed zapysыvalo all ustnuyu a question in the process of meeting, which will be there is proof in court. To do this on ymeet mechanism, who pozvolyaet specialist proslushyvat all that the zapysыvaetsya.
Thank attention dolzhno udelyatsya preservation zapysannыh audyofaylov. Disc records dolzhnы bыt tschatelnыm image oboznachenы with ukazanyem room affairs, dat slushanye and mestonahozhdenye judgment.
Lazernыe discs with seryynыm number sleduyut Deposit in specially oborudovannoy komnate in the locker of relevant in kotorыh drives skladыvayutsya by poryadkovыm number sudebnыh Affairs. At of all drives necessarily dolzhna bыt inscription "no deletion", "not demagnetize." Otredaktyrovanyy disc seryynoho number as a proof falsyfykatsyy the materials before a criminal affairs.
The introduction Tehnicheskoe records sudebnoho process in the Ukrainian sudoproyzvodstve svydetelstvuet stremlenyy of improving functioning sudebnoy system in Ukraine, napravlennoy to protect the rights and freedoms of man and citizen. But эtu zakonnuyu protsessualnuyu vozmozhnostyu else you need nauchytsya realyzovыvat how zaschyte so and participants of the second process. FIRST sudebnoe razbyratelstvo do this, judgment, pryhovor Kotor was a otmenen 30 June 2011 year spetsyalyzyrovannыm High Court, too, held under the chairmanship of Different judges Snyhuryvskoho court, but no protection of yspolzovala Then completely the possibility of article 129 of the Constitution. The right to protection of and still you need the Use umet effectively.
Before the principle re sudebnoho razbyratelstva zaschytnyku OPERATIONAL entered information about the zaplanyrovannoy falsyfykatsyy sudebnoho investigation personally judges Kyshkovskoy ZA. And later judges has been in zaschytnyka lychnoy operative in the drafting.
In dannoy article raskrыvayutsya lysh that REAL funds to razoblachenyyu orhanyzovannoy prestupnoy group in the Ukrainian judges and Legalization operative information on the prestupnыh s intent, which were zafyksyrovanы with the help of legal ways - fyksyrovanyya sudebnoho razbyratelstva immediately dvumya alternatyvnыmy Technical funds and subsequent s sravnytelnыm analysis.
In comparative analysis appeared versions, why ymenno Some clips shown svydeteley obvynenyya bыly sfalsyfytsyrovanы. But analysis sravnytelnыh table-this is already subject Different articles.
In the future protection of our plans in court and made the others эffektyvnыe nadezhnыe tehnycheskye and zakonnыe protsessualnыe pryemы, as well as sovershenstvovat taktycheskuyu basis for the application of s, the realization kotoroy in the investigation do this, sfalsyfytsyrovannoho criminal affairs (and not only ego) yavlyaetsya one from the problems of specific zaschytnyka.
With the introduction deystvennыh and Technical nadezhnыh funds in everyone Court of Ukraine, will become more than sudoproyzvodstvo prozrachno, judges will vыnuzhden vosproyzvodyt all obstoyatelstva sudebnoho sledstvyya, realyzovыvat restructuring to ensure the vыyavlenyya ystynы, protection of rights and freedoms of the participants of the process. And this is will nadezhnыm barerom for falsyfykatsyy sudebnoho investigation by the judges.
Not protect the sozertsala passyvno by falsyfykatsyey sudebnoho investigation and reshytelno and obosnovano filed a statement on otvode judges through EE neobъektyvnost, p reshytelnыm requirements of CEI stop the "not protsessualnыy circus" at Tehnicheskoe holding of records. But judges proyhnoryrovala this is a statement and upryamo prodolzhala zapysыvat svoy prestupnыe act in audio and vydeozapys. Record has been Sudebnaya sweat unychtozhena with the help of 4 konvetatsyy bytыy format and Alternate 16 bytnaya Record yavlyaetsya proof prestupnыh of action эtoy judges.
At the second admission and methods razoblachenyya falsyfykatorov, prymenyaemыh protection of the criminal in so doing will actually Published in the next article.
The sites can be pravozaschytы Compare Difference 16 Bit audyofayla - oryhynala and otredaktyrovannoho 4 Bit file with the disk without seryynoho room, who is on as a proof falsyfykatsyy criminal affairs.
|
