Welcome Guest | RSS

Chernjuk Alexander, a human rights site.

Friday, 17.05.2024, 14:26
Main » Articles » My articles

Unsolved mysteries of lawyers (advocates) in the criminal process, or as deliberately and legally protect the defendant in the trial.
Unsolved mysteries of lawyers (advocates) in the criminal process, or as deliberately and legally protect the defendant in the trial.

"Any judicial system, much less protective strategy should be based on the productive knowledge of their theoretical foundations, which in turn must be supported by the facts of their successful practical application."
Of course, one can not disagree with the assertion that the view from the side, in most cases, can more objectively assess the situation. Timely noticed by law, formed by the fusion of previous laws and chance, of course, is more common in relation to the previous one and expands the horizons of our knowledge.
If you submit a procedural way of thinking as a process and knowledge as a result of this process, then, as we know, any result could be a process for the more general result, and in this lies the infinity of knowledge as a process.
Maximum efficiency is achieved through knowledge of a reasonable balance between analysis and synthesis of learning objectives, and therefore undue depression in any subject will inevitably alienates us from the truth. And it can be considered as one of the extremes of the process of cognition.
Lack of understanding of the processes and laws that govern them, usually leads to denial and misperception of the results of the judicial system or law strategy strategy. Defenders in the criminal process often hear the phrase about "the invention of the legal" bicycle ", which may be true only in the sense that" the inventor of the bicycle "really invented it, even if it is in some cases, only for himself.
For ideas of justice or of law, by and large public recognition is not as important compared to its practicability, because: "... eternal truths can not be transmitted mechanically, but in every period must all be born again of the human soul" - wrote in his time, Carl Jung.
Speaking of that depression in some area of legal knowledge should be combined with a recess in the adjacent area to it, does not meant that the operative must make discoveries along the way, for example, in the bar. No, it is also a kind of extreme. A characteristic feature of excessive deepening of an object is a departure away from the intended target, in other words, this degree of depression which can lead to a change in the original the most common dominant and undue loss of time.
Or the other extreme, resulting from over-generalization of the investigation of cognition - the so-called "marking time", exceeding the pre-trial investigation is accompanied by lack of results, due to the artificial restraint give way to another dominant.
Therefore, the first step to the synthesis of deepening and broadening of knowledge is to avoid such extremes.
Reciprocal spillover to the laws of chance in the investigation of a criminal offense, and vice versa, shows that the accident or violation of law by the judicial system occur more frequently, and for this reason that we are protesting against them, the legitimized them in their minds, despite the fact that regularity of the investigative and judicial errors, leading to more frequent manifestation, remains unknown to us.
To determine the predictability and the chance of errors in the trial, prosecutors and police need to study stable and unstable dynamic pre-trial and trial proceedings, which combine the random and regular than the legal processes in a single picture of legal nihilism on the part of law enforcement and justice.
These processes can transform into each other. Therefore, as a result we can obtain a coherent and integrated system, combining both random and pre-defined processes.
But since we can not accurately provide absolutely all the features of the initial conditions of a trial in which we build a protective system in a court or lawyer's investigation, it should be a philosophical attitude to the possible errors of the judicial system, to learn from them and incorporate them into the existing protective system .
Category: My articles | Added by: Alex (11.07.2010)
Views: 461 | Rating: 4.0/1
Total comments: 0
Name *:
Email *:
Code *: